NGONGANG, BIGOT, NSEME, SOUMAH, and SANDO: Homicide and corpse dismemberment: A study of one case


Homicide is a wrongful criminal act likely to be perpetrated at any time and in any place. In most cases, the criminal’s major concern is concealing his act.

Dismembering is fragmentation or disintegration of the body or parts of the body. 1, 2 To commit this misdeed, aggressors use sharp items of all kinds (a saw, knife, cutlass, etc.); it may consider articulations (disarticulations). Depending on the purpose and motivations behind a homicide, a distinction is usually made between ,“defensive mutilation”, the reason for which is to dispose of the body and/or make its identification more difficult; “ײaggressive mutilation,״ in which the murder and mutilation are caused by indignation;

ײoffensive mutilation״, in which dismembering corpse is the real purpose of the killer, and in which mutilation may begin while the victim is still alive and may continue after the murder; and “necro-maniac mutilation״, in which parts of the body are used by the aggressor as an object for sexual gratification.1, 3, 4, 5 Defensive mutilation is the most common form of mutilation.4, 5

In West Africa, there are very few dismemberment cases. We report one case in which a corpse was discovered alongside the corniche of Dakar. Examination of the body and forensic autopsy helped identify the motives behind the dismemberment.



A plastic bag containing one dismembered body was discovered by a fisherman on a beach of Dakar. As soon as he was informed, the public prosecutor at the magistrates’ court of the Dakar region ordered an investigation.

As part of this investigation, the judge sent a request to the medical examiner. Then, examination of the body was followed by a forensic autopsy.

Examination of the body

Examination of the body and the bag contents revealed a young adult African female. The contents were inventoried, and 13 body parts were identified (Figure 1, Figure 2) resulting from the following ײdisarticulations 1: 1 decapitation with disarticulation of inter-vertebral discs (C4–C5), 2 disarticulations of the scapulohumeral joints, 1 disarticulation of the right elbow, 2 disarticulations of the radiocarpal joints, 2 coxofemoral disarticulations, 2 disarticulations of the femorotibial joints, and 2 disarticulations of the tibia and talus joints. The condition of the body parts suggested a recent death.  

Figure 1

Different segments of the body

Figure 2

Different segments of the body

Autopsy and crime scene reconstruction

During the actual autopsy (Figure 3), crime scene reconstruction was performed. The pieces of body were in a good state of conservation. Dermabrasions were identified at the chin level. Section planes did not present bruising or ecchymosis; they respected the articulations, thus mimicking real disarticulations.

Figure 3

External examination on the autopsy table

The costosternal breastplate was opened, and the left lung presented with ecchymosis lesions (Figure 4 ). These injuries were compatible with mechanical asphyxia.

Figure 4

Left pleural ecchymoses

At the digestive system level, the gastric contents consisted of food. We did not note any damage to the mucosa. The rest of the examination did not show other traumatic injuries or abnormalities likely to be lethal.

The autopsy revealed a violent death by mechanical asphyxia, specifically involving suffocation. The absence of ecchymosis in the section planes indicated that dismemberment had been done after death.

From a forensic point of view, there was no doubt about that the death was criminal.


Dismemberment is a procedure that an aggressor uses to cut up the human body into many fragments for various reasons. This term does not apply when body parts are separated during a traffic accident or explosion. Corpse dismemberment is a punishable offence distinct from homicide because it breaches the inviolability of and respect due to human remains.6

The concealment of a dead body seems to be the main purpose; this is done to impede the identification of the victim. Most dismemberment procedures reported by Konopka and Rajs7 show defensive mutilation. By cutting the corpse, the aggressor is mainly motivated by the necessity of removing the body from the location of the homicide. This also specifies the typical postmortem nature of dismemberment.

The analysis of the aggressor profile allows us to argue that in most cases, the murderer is someone known by the victim.1, 3 This proximity is a reason for criminal mutilation.3

The use of sharp items is necessary (a kitchen knife or cutlass); this case is a perfect illustration. Some authors have also reported the use of a chainsaw8 or sharp items and blunt objects. According to Nunzio et al.,9 knives are the most commonly used weapons in cases of offensive dismemberment, and before this type of dismemberment, excess power is usually exerted, thus illustrating the lethal rampage of the murderer.

The cause of death differs depending on the series of events. We referred to our case as traumatic asphyxia. Zerbo10 specifies in his case that death resulted from traumatic brain injury (TBI) caused using sharp items and blunt objects.


Dismembering corpses is a highly uncommon procedure in West Africa; however, it is often the result of an attempt to hide a dead body after homicide. This mutilation usually happens where the murder took place without any prior planning by the aggressor, and in most cases, mutilation is practised as a postmortem procedure.

Conflict of Interest

The authors of this paper hereby certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial or non-financial interest.



K Puschel E Koops Dismemberment and mutilationArch Kriminol19871802840


BA Hyma VJ Rao Evaluation and identification of dismembered human remainsAm J Forensic Med Pathol19911242919


J Rajs M Lundstrom M Broberg Criminal mutilation of the human body in Sweden - a thirty year medico-legal and forensic psychiatry studyJ Forensic Sci199843356380


H Helin Hajjanen-Nyholm G Weizmann-Henelius S Salenius N Lindberg E Repo-Tiihonen Homicides with mutilation of the victim’s bodyJ Forensic Sci20095449337


Y Schulz H Mossakowski K Albrecht Postmortem dismemberment/mutilation - medico-legal and criminalistic evaluation of the autopsies performed by the Institute of Legal Medicine at the Hanover Medical SchoolArch Kriminol2008221116


T Konopka M Strona F Bolechała J Kunz Corpse dismemberment in the material collected by the Department of Forensic MedicineLeg Med (Tokyo)200791113


T Konopka F Bolechala M Strona An unusual case of corpse dismembermentAm J Forensic Med Pathol200627163165


B Madea F Driever Cadaver dismemberment by chain sawArch Kriminol20002057581


DN Nunzio Fulvio V Michele DN Cosimo Dismemberment, a review of the literature and description of 3 CasesAm J Forensic Med Pathol20062730712


S Zerbo A Lanzarone P Procaccianti EV Spagnolo A Argo Homicide with post mortem dismemberment of the victim with previous amputation of right lower limb: Case report and review of the literatureMed Leg J20188642135


© This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article History

Received : 18-08-2021

Accepted : 20-10-2021

Available online : 20-12-2021

View Article

PDF File   Full Text Article


PDF File   XML File   ePub File

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

Article DOI

Article Metrics

Article Access statistics

Viewed: 120

PDF Downloaded: 33

Open Abstract (Increase article citation) Wiki in hindi